Another seemingly obvious epiphany that I had recently is
how important something as simple as how the seating in a room can affect
student participation and lesson comprehension. Most science classrooms are
designed around desks, and they invariably force students to sit at odd angles
in relation to where most of the instruction takes place. I understand the need
to have student-centered learning, however, having students facing away from
the focus of instruction does very little for a 14 year-old’s comprehension.
The standard single seats from the 70’s and 80’s seem to be traded out at an
increasing rate for more social desk groupings. This is even taking place in
non-science classrooms. I have recently discussed this issue with one of my
cooperating teachers, and he stated that he can understand my point of view,
especially considering the few number of labs we do that require desk usage.
With the fundamental purpose of teaching being the transfer of understandings
to our students, I feel that anything that promotes this idea should be
embraced. The classes I am teaching this semester are all taking place in
portable rooms that have no distinct designation between Social Science,
English, or Earth Science. However, the classrooms where science isn’t being
taught all have conventional single seating, and those teaching science all
have table group seating.
I
see the benefit of having tables available for students while conducting lab
work, but during the other 80% of their time in the classroom, the table group
seating works against their ability to remain focused. Having experimented with
multiple table arrangements over the past school year, I have seen how quickly
students drift away from the central focus of the lesson when they are staring
directly at another student. Some of my best students have been distracted by
students around them when seating assignments and arrangements change.
Unfortunately, I don’t see any one correct answer to this problem. Limited space
and larger numbers of students in every class will likely just exacerbate the
problem. Facing a student in any direction away from the focus of learning is
simply telling them that what is going on isn’t really important. Students know
that the direction they are facing is where the information is, whether that
information is content or socially based.
Carl,
ReplyDeleteI completely agree and understand where you are coming from when dealing with the whole student seating issue. I am currently with Seniors (horrible senioritis!!!) and just started lit circles. Even though period 6 works well, the students in period 4 have decided that lit circles is the perfect time to talk (because they are in table groups). Although they are improving, I do have to say that the first day was a very frustrating time! Maybe in the future we'll have modern desks that allow for more mobility.